- ...words
- An approach of automatised
termextraction for example identifies existing and known terms, that are
already classified, and adds unknown terms to the same domain if certain
criteria are fulfilled.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...specifica
- For further information on different
ways of definition see for example Trippel (1999).
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...cases
- Other forms of
reception can be realised for example via read-back systems. Computer programs
can also serve as recipients using links to connect to different files, which
is a common techniques for web robots and search engines to index site contents.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...map
- Fischer (1995) defines injective:``Eine Abbildung 5#5 heißt injektiv, falls aus 6#6 und f(x) =f(x') stets x = x' folgt.''
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...map
- Fischer (1995) defines surjective as follows: ``Eine Abbildung 5#5 heißt surjektiv, falls f(X)=Y, d.h. falls es zu jedem 7#7 ein 8#8 gibt mit y = f(x)''.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...relation
- To cover the problem of homonymy and polysemy it is
not possible to reduce the class of relations to maps. If the problem
of polysemy and homonymy is solved in another way it might become
possible to only use maps with all the positive consequences for
formal descriptions this restrictions inherits. However a first approach will only use maps, the problem cases will be dealt separately
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...answered
- This is a simplification, though. In fact the inference engine follows the longest matching path, if nothing else matches the empty path is taken, if a rule fits that refers back to other bits of information the path is taken, until the query is answered.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...lexica
- It might be considered using scripting languages such
as JavaScript to implement this sort of interactiveness but no implementation
of this is present right now. Furthermore JavaScript is an extension of HTML
and does not conform with SGML standards yet.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...exceptions
- For the treatment of exceptions see section
4.5.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...tense
- This is surely a shortcoming
due to limitation to classic grammatical terminology. In fact this category
is only implemented for the verb `be' because the future of `be' is used to
construct other future tenses. This is also the reason why no other tenses
which are constructed by combination with an auxiliary verb are
implemented. The modal `will' is seen as the future of `be' here.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.